As frequently
seems to happen, the richest insights come later in the week after I have been encountered
by how the passages first present themselves. So here I am on Friday rather
enthralled by a connection I first noticed yesterday in 2 Samuel 7:1-14a and
Ephesians 2:11-22. When David was securely established as King of all Israel,
he wanted to build a house, a temple, for God, which is rejected by God’s word
to Nathan the Prophet. This section of Ephesians concludes with affirming that
in Christ, we are becoming the household of God, growing into a holy temple,
being built into a dwelling place for God.
I am not among
those who view biblical prophecy or the Hebrew Scriptures as some sort of code
by which we can predict history, if only we could decipher the cryptic message as
though the Bible was God’s Ouija Board. But
I do believe profound patterns weave their way in and out of human spiritual
consciousness and the shared experiences and insights of the community of faith
generation after generation. The expansive interaction of the language in these
two passages, separated by perhaps a millennium, illuminates the current path
of my journey.
Early in my
career, I adopted the metaphor of living in tents from Hebrews 11:9-10 as
defining guidance for my path. I started out in Christian education research
and curriculum development, went on to congregational education ministry, and
concluded as a pastor. My wife of nearly 50 years has been a faithful and
patient companion on this journey that took us from Minnesota, to Illinois, to
New Jersey, to Ontario, to Wisconsin, to Texas, to Oklahoma, and now back to
Wisconsin. When people ask where we are from, I typically answer with some
variant on “Yes.” … Then I add, “I grew up in California and my wife in
Minnesota, and we have pitched our tent in a half-dozen places.” Now in our 70s, we anticipate that we will be
tenting in Milwaukee, sharing a duplex with our son and his family, for the
rest of our days. We have gone from caring for the souls of congregations of
God’s people to journeying together with my wife’s Alzheimer’s. We do this with
profound gratitude for and dependence on our family’s support, even as we endeavor
to support her 91 year old father who continues to live in his own home in
Minneapolis as his strength declines. I do not view this as some unjust burden
but as a joyful and suitable conclusion of our journey.
So when King David
wanted to build a suitable house for God, he was expressing the desire for a
tangible expression of God’s power in his own journey. Ah yes, a building
people could see and touch and marvel at to focus their attention on the
majesty of God. Aware that God had been with David all along, the Prophet
Nathan gave the preliminary go-ahead. God did not reprimand either Nathan or
David for this, but directed their attention to dig deeper. God didn’t need
human trappings to be recognized as glorious. A tent would do. Sure it had been
a beautiful artistic expression of worship in its time. Who knows what remained
of the Tabernacle from the Wilderness days by David’s time? But human artistry
paled by comparison to the God it honored. I won’t spell out the details, but I
am not leaving a legacy of institutional success. Two of the congregations and
one of the organizations with whom I served no longer exist. Others are much
diminished from their peaks.
The image of the
tent in Nathan’s word from God for David suggests God is portable, on a
journey, not interested in being confined to a single location or moment. So
while David would not build a physical house for God, God promised to build a
house from David. The sense of the word switched to mean a legacy in
descendants, people. This goes beyond the Davidic royal line in ancient Judah
and takes on what have come to be identified as messianic overtones, but
mingled with the seemingly contradictory promise of building a physical Temple,
which happened through David’s son Solomon. Held up against this elevated
language, Solomon was surely a disappointment. Yet, the promise of a community
of people to come after David points to something far greater than a building
or a regal dynasty.
So while not a
wooden, literalistic prophetic fulfillment, the imagery of Ephesians expands of
the household motif. Gentiles who had no connection with David, inherit
a place in the household of God. The scope of David’s legacy is so expansive
that all humanity is included. It is about people, not physical buildings or
human institutions or structures. On my journey I have been a participant in
this community of love. At every one of the campsites on our journey we have
added to our rich treasury of relationships. Though measuring my contribution
to the lives of these folk is impossible and probably counter-productive, we
thrill to continue to be included in the now widespread journeys of many whose
paths crossed ours decades ago. I am learning to appreciate that this legacy in
people is far more significant and satisfying than career monuments. Indeed, we
are the ones who have been enriched. We are the rich legacy of many hundreds of
others, some we knew but most we didn’t.
The whole
Temple motif, built and joined as a structure with foundations and cornerstone,
is given a distinctly organic significance in Ephesians. This household of God
grows into a dwelling place for God. I grew up hearing 1 Corinthians 6:19, “Your
body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you,” as a stern caution
about tobacco, alcohol, drugs, and sex. As I probed scripture and faith with
emerging adult maturity, I began to quiver at the wonder of the Spirit of God
dwelling in me. As my meditations progressed this week, I have pondered that the
temple God inhabits is in the spaces between the people in my treasury of
relationships, and far beyond that to the entire realm of human love.
No comments:
Post a Comment