I am not much fond of labels whether they be political (conservative-liberal),
theological (evangelical-progressive), liturgical (traditional-contemporary),
or social (values-rights, rugged individualism-common good). I think even
labels to identify positions on issues are not helpful (pro-life-pro-choice,
religious freedom-individual freedom, pro-Second Amendment-Sensible Gun Control).
Understandably, movements also adopt slogans as shorthand to rally around
(Black Lives Matter-Blue Lives Matter). Instead of promoting understanding, these
divide and polarize. On the one hand, they obscure nuanced thinking, and on the
other hand, they associate people with drastically different views together
under one label, all too often as a way of discrediting something without
understanding or addressing it. As convenient as labels are as shorthand for
making particular points, they truncate true dialog and thought.
I am not comfortable identifying with any of these labels. I
am happy to have real conversation with people who disagree with me on just
about anything. I believe we can all learn from each other but don’t have to
convince each other. But I don’t want to be labeled so as to be tossed in a bin
of those who are like me or not like me.
As I pastor I have served congregations who struggled mightily
with theological, ethical, liturgical, and social differences of opinion. I can’t
claim to have been particularly successful at this, but I have aspired to
encourage people to try to learn from each other rather than convince each
other, to love each other rather than shun each other, as they find deeper
unity in following Jesus than in their disagreements. I know all too well the
argument, “As I read the Bible, I must take this position and cannot accept a
different position as legitimate.” I have found it exceedingly challenging to
help those who take that approach to listen to why those who disagree with them
are as confident they are following the Bible or Jesus as they are. I have felt
the pressure from partisans of these social movements to publically take sides and
use my pastoral influence (if not authority) to promote one side or the other
in these conflicts. I have repeatedly said thing like, “I don’t want to be
known for what I say about (sex, guns, politics, etc.) but for pointing people
to Jesus and inviting them to trust and follow him. It’s not that I don’t think
our opinions about these issues don’t matter in how we follow Jesus, but when
we keep Christ at the center (thank you Dietrich Bonhoeffer) we begin to get
some perspective on our propensity to build our allegiances to temporary human
thought instead of the eternal reign of God.
No comments:
Post a Comment