Last
week, as I considered the Parable of the Prodigal Son in my lectio divina, I wrestled with how this
came as the climax of three “lost and found” parables that Jesus told because “the Pharisees and the scribes were
grumbling and saying, ‘This fellow [Jesus] welcomes sinners and eats with them.’” (Luke
15:2) To just consider this a rebuke to the self-righteous religious leaders
just seemed inadequate. Thank you, Sarah MacDonald, for your worship message
for Milwaukee Mennonite Church yesterday that help clarify and articulate some
of the thoughts I had but couldn’t quite assemble during the week.
Just as the father invited the elder son to
join the celebration of the younger son’s return, with these parables, Jesus
was inviting the religious leaders to loosen their grip on their stifling self-righteousness
and enter into the joy of welcoming and celebrating those who were returning to
life.
With
the masterful stoke of superb storytelling, Jesus did not finish the story. We
are left to wonder whether the elder son came into the party or not? With what
attitude and emotions? What was the relationship between the brothers during
and after the party? Did the younger brother become a hired hand? What happened
after the father died? Similarly, Luke did not indicate the response of the
religious leaders to whom Jesus told these parables. We know that as a body,
they continued to oppose Jesus to his death. But we also know some followed
Jesus – Nicodemus, Joseph of Arimathea. But here, Luke did not indicate any
reaction or response from them to Jesus’ sharply pointed parables clearly
directed at them. I think the open-endedness of both Jesus and Luke were intentional to prompt
our divergent thinking and responses.
No comments:
Post a Comment