Tuesday, February 18, 2020

Accessible Perfection



In the section of the Sermon on the Mount for next Sunday’s lectionary reading (February 23, 2020), Matthew 5:38-48, Jesus made two specific allusions to Leviticus 19:1-18 (which is logically the lectionary reading from the Hebrew Scriptures).
This section of Leviticus opens with “You shall be holy, for I the Lord your God am holy.” (v. 2) Jesus concluded this section of the Sermon on the Mount with “Be perfect, therefore, as you heavenly Father is perfect.” (v. 48) Jesus’ example of this perfection is that the heavenly Father “makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the righteous and on the unrighteous.” Linking the Levitical source with Jesus’ allusion suggests that God’s perfect holiness is expressed through love (steadfast love – hesed repeatedly in the Hebrew Scriptures, especially the Psalms) extended without regard to presumed worthiness.
Jesus sets this as the foundation for his instruction to “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.” (v. 44) Interestingly, Jesus set this against what must have been a common distortion of Leviticus 19:18 when he said, “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’” for Leviticus says nothing about hating enemies. Jesus went on to acknowledge our natural tendency to love those who are close to us and like us, that is what anyone would do. His call to love enemies lifts his expectations above ordinary human compassion to aspire and even participate in God’s perfect holiness by loving those who are not like us, even those who do not deserve to be loved, even our enemies. In case you are prone to protest that you have no enemies, consider who might think of you as their enemy.
Jesus’ allusions to Leviticus are simple extensions of God’s consistent love for all people in all times and all places. He made no effort to delve into the complexities of understanding, interpreting, and applying the Levitical Holiness Code for his time or ours. Plenty of things there were so specific to the ancient Hebrews that we easily recognize they are not relevant to us, and may not have addressed things in Jesus’ time either. Some things there evoke controversial debates as to whether and how they may or may not address concerns of our time. Overall, the point of the Levitical Holiness Code was to distinguish the ancient Hebrews from their pagan neighbors, to prohibit practices intrinsic to the idolatry that was a lure to them. I only want to acknowledge that reality and not try to sort that out. Not only is it beyond my expertise, I don’t want to get sidetracked from the power of how Jesus drew on Leviticus in the Sermon on the Mount.
Embedded in the Levitical Holiness Code (and other sometimes puzzling things in the Hebrew Scriptures) are profound affirmations that transcend times, places, and cultures. I believe this is one of them that is incisive for contentious issues in our present time and context. Between the two lines Jesus alluded to is this.
When you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap to the very edges of your field, or gather the gleanings of your harvest. You shall not strip your vineyard bare, or gather the fallen grapes of your vineyard; you shall leave them for the poor and the alien: I am the Lord your God. (vv. 9-10)
A lot of contentious debate currently surrounds how, if at all, to support and protect the poorest and aliens among us. On one side are those who argue that this is a public and even government responsibility. On the other side are those who argue that tax supported, government programs are an unjustly imposed charity, which should be personal and voluntary. Gleaning is not limited to ancient Hebrew society, but it is codified here and elsewhere in the Hebrew Scriptures. While it was not a government program, it was an expression of both justice and compassion. To go back through a field or vineyard or orchard so nothing would be left for gleaners was regarded as theft from the poor, from the community, and from God. In a non-mechanical, agrarian society abundance was for the benefit of the whole community, and not a right to be claimed by property holders (the idea of personal property was inconsistent with the understanding that those who held land at the moment did so in trust for future generations and the whole community, so as Leviticus 25:23 says, “The land must not be sold permanently, because the land is mine (God’s) and you are but aliens and my tenants.”) Literal gleaning is not too practical in our urban technological society. While gleaning was enforced by social norms (see the book of Ruth) and not government mandate, in our society we depend on government for structures that support the common good. The government is not some alien entity imposing its external will, but even when we don’t like it, government is us and how we live together in a large, complex society.
I am suggesting that in both public and private spheres, we who are people of The Book (Jews and Christians alike) do the hard work of creative thinking and advocacy for ways to bring the principles of gleaning into our society. Abundance is to be shared. The poor are helped in ways that respect their dignity and contribution to the society. Those who are least able (and maybe least deserving) are supported with justice and compassion acknowledging our shared humanity (theologically created in the image of God).
I am also suggesting that pitting voluntary charity and public/government support against each other is a false dichotomy. Deuteronomy 15 addresses a number of justice concerns, several of which involve the poor and are implemented through the practice of the Sabbatical Year and the urging “not to be hard-hearted or tightfisted toward your needy neighbor.” (v. 7) It recognizes the paradoxical realities of shared human life. “There will, however, be no one in need among you.” (v. 4) and “There will never cease to be some in need on the earth.” (v. 11), which Jesus alluded to in Matthew 26:11, “You will always have the poor with you.” not as an excuse for dismissing caring for them as hopeless but as a perpetual incentive to be generous in his name. Thus, Deuteronomy endorses voluntary generosity, not in lieu of public/government action, but as an expression of loving your neighbor as yourself. “Provide liberally out of your flock, your threshing floor, and your wine press, thus giving to him some of the bounty with which the Lord your God has blessed you.” (v. 14) “Open your hand to the poor and needy neighbor in your land.” (v. 11)
I have observed many times that Psalm 72 is clear that justice and compassion for the poor, the foreigners, the weak, etc. is the responsibility of the king, government. Yes, that was ancient Israel, but the Psalm makes no comment on the king’s personal faith, and I believe it is consistent with why the New Testament teaches respect for government, even though for the first three centuries of the Church, government largely excluded and even persecuted them. In my half century of praying through the Psalms monthly, on the 12th of each month I come to that Psalm and pray in that way for whoever is US President at the time and all others in government service. So I affirm that compassion and justice, support and provision for the poor is a concern of the whole society, both private and government. We who claim to base our worldviews on the Bible (with admittedly varying approaches) ought to be leading the way for working together to these ends. http://nstolpepilgrim.blogspot.com/search?q=how+I+am+praying+for+President



No comments: